PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clorox has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 11.15%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Clorox's return on equity of 270.67%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $172.88, signalling upside risk potential of 10.08%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $145.64 which suggests that it could grow by 15.09%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.527% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.096%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than Clorox's net income of $186M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.93x while Clorox's PE ratio is 22.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.61x versus 2.25x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 11.72%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $172.88, signalling upside risk potential of 10.08%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $142.07 which suggests that it could grow by 9.81%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.527% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.349, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.098%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.93x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 17.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.61x versus 2.20x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 10.24%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $172.88, signalling upside risk potential of 10.08%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $148.06 which suggests that it could grow by 9.46%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than PepsiCo.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.527% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.552%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.93x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.61x versus 2.04x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 2.71%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Walmart's return on equity of 20.37%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $172.88, signalling upside risk potential of 10.08%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $109.3190 which suggests that it could grow by 15.8%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.527% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.279%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $165.6B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is lower than Walmart's net income of $4.5B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.93x while Walmart's PE ratio is 40.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.61x versus 1.11x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.