KMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 14.05%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $142.94, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $98.77 which suggests that it could grow by 8.74%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.356, which suggesting that the stock is 64.407% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.596%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.27x versus 3.74x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Honest has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of -0.81%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79% beat The Honest's return on equity of -4.47%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $142.94, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand The Honest has an analysts' consensus of $7.17 which suggests that it could grow by 63.62%. Given that The Honest has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe The Honest is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.356, which suggesting that the stock is 64.407% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Honest has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. The Honest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. The Honest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than The Honest quarterly revenues of $99.8M. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M is higher than The Honest's net income of -$810K. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while The Honest's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.27x versus 1.17x for The Honest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 19.06%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $142.94, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.51 which suggests that it could grow by 8.11%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.356, which suggesting that the stock is 64.407% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.27x versus 4.65x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 11.72% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 3.36%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $142.94, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $90.75 which suggests that it could grow by 44.11%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.356, which suggesting that the stock is 64.407% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.39100000000001%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 15.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.27x versus 0.62x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.