KMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 14.64%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 434.96%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $149.83, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $104.73 which suggests that it could grow by 13.36%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.402, which suggesting that the stock is 59.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.425, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.48%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 76.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $5B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $5B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M is higher than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $737M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.22x versus 3.79x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 5.62%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09% beat Clorox's return on equity of 135.23%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $149.83, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $164.46 which suggests that it could grow by 0.63%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Clorox.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.402, which suggesting that the stock is 59.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.102%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Clorox offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M is higher than Clorox's net income of $99M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Clorox's PE ratio is 56.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.22x versus 2.73x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Honest has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 0.17%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09% beat The Honest's return on equity of -3.3%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $149.83, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand The Honest has an analysts' consensus of $7.14 which suggests that it could grow by 3.82%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than The Honest, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than The Honest.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.402, which suggesting that the stock is 59.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Honest has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. The Honest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. The Honest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than The Honest quarterly revenues of $99.2M. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M is higher than The Honest's net income of $165K. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while The Honest's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.22x versus 1.85x for The Honest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 3.7%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $149.83, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.79%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.402, which suggesting that the stock is 59.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.22x versus 0.87x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.