WMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dollar Tree has a net margin of 2.91% compared to Walmart's net margin of 73.9%. Walmart's return on equity of 21.04% beat Dollar Tree's return on equity of -45.07%.

Walmart has a consensus price target of $107.2835, signalling upside risk potential of 10.11%. On the other hand Dollar Tree has an analysts' consensus of $85.42 which suggests that it could grow by 0.05%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Dollar Tree, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Dollar Tree.

Walmart has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dollar Tree has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.155%.

Walmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Dollar Tree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Walmart pays 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Dollar Tree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walmart quarterly revenues are $180.6B, which are larger than Dollar Tree quarterly revenues of -$5B. Walmart's net income of $5.3B is higher than Dollar Tree's net income of -$3.7B. Notably, Walmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.43x while Dollar Tree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walmart is 1.16x versus 1.05x for Dollar Tree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 2.91% compared to Walmart's net margin of 29.92%. Walmart's return on equity of 21.04% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

Walmart has a consensus price target of $107.2835, signalling upside risk potential of 10.11%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.48 which suggests that it could grow by 8.86%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Walmart has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.575%.

Walmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Walmart pays 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walmart quarterly revenues are $180.6B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Walmart's net income of $5.3B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Walmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.43x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walmart is 1.16x versus 6.55x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 2.91% compared to Walmart's net margin of 10.24%. Walmart's return on equity of 21.04% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Walmart has a consensus price target of $107.2835, signalling upside risk potential of 10.11%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Walmart, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Walmart.

Walmart has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

Walmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Walmart pays 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walmart quarterly revenues are $180.6B, which are larger than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Walmart's net income of $5.3B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Walmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.43x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walmart is 1.16x versus 1.98x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 2.91% compared to Walmart's net margin of 19.06%. Walmart's return on equity of 21.04% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Walmart has a consensus price target of $107.2835, signalling upside risk potential of 10.11%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.51 which suggests that it could grow by 8.11%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Walmart has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

Walmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Walmart pays 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walmart quarterly revenues are $180.6B, which are larger than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Walmart's net income of $5.3B is higher than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Walmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.43x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walmart is 1.16x versus 4.65x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.