PEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 14.22%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $150.06, signalling upside risk potential of 13.42%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 16.52%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than PepsiCo.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.485, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.497%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 30.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 1.99x versus 2.91x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 29.92%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $150.06, signalling upside risk potential of 13.42%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.74%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.874%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 1.99x versus 6.65x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 4.32%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.15%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $150.06, signalling upside risk potential of 13.42%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $72.63 which suggests that it could grow by 6.74%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Mondelez International, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Mondelez International.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.483, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.72%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 50.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is higher than Mondelez International's net income of $402M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 25.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 1.99x versus 2.49x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 23.89%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $150.06, signalling upside risk potential of 13.42%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $62.3088 which suggests that it could fall by -2.5%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.757%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.46x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 39.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 1.99x versus 8.51x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.