CL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clorox has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 11.15%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97% beat Clorox's return on equity of 270.67%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $142.11 which suggests that it could grow by 10.7%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Clorox.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.096%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M is higher than Clorox's net income of $186M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.53x while Clorox's PE ratio is 23.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.57x versus 2.28x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 29.92%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.71 which suggests that it could grow by 11.25%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.785%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.53x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 27.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.57x versus 6.43x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 19.06%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.53 which suggests that it could grow by 10.59%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.527%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.53x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 24.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.57x versus 4.55x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 0.13%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $81.14 which suggests that it could grow by 44.72%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.372, which suggesting that the stock is 62.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.074%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.53x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 26.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.57x versus 0.53x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.