UBER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of -8.72%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $95.95, signalling upside risk potential of 7.81%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $418.53 which suggests that it could fall by -11.37%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.019%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 4.20x versus 29.68x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 36.37%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Intuit's return on equity of 18.57%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $95.95, signalling upside risk potential of 7.81%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $773.81 which suggests that it could grow by 2.91%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Intuit.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.835%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Intuit quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is lower than Intuit's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Intuit's PE ratio is 61.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 4.20x versus 11.70x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 36.86%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $95.95, signalling upside risk potential of 7.81%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $509.92 which suggests that it could grow by 10.69%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 4.20x versus 12.74x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 20.78%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $95.95, signalling upside risk potential of 7.81%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $178.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.01%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.667%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Oracle's PE ratio is 38.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 4.20x versus 8.29x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.