INTU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Intuit's net margin of 18.49%. Intuit's return on equity of 16.84% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Intuit has a consensus price target of $697.18, signalling upside risk potential of 6.62%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $320.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.36%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Intuit.

Intuit has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

Intuit has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuit pays 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuit quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Intuit's net income of $471M is higher than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Intuit's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.00x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 56.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuit is 10.80x versus 10.18x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Intuit's net margin of 17.09%. Intuit's return on equity of 16.84% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Intuit has a consensus price target of $697.18, signalling upside risk potential of 6.62%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $364.33 which suggests that it could grow by 32.28%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Intuit.

Intuit has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.813%.

Intuit has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Intuit pays 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuit quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Intuit's net income of $471M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Intuit's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.00x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 43.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuit is 10.80x versus 7.08x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Intuit's net margin of 36.86%. Intuit's return on equity of 16.84% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Intuit has a consensus price target of $697.18, signalling upside risk potential of 6.62%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $505.59 which suggests that it could grow by 15.24%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Intuit.

Intuit has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Intuit has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Intuit pays 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuit quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Intuit's net income of $471M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Intuit's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.00x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 33.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuit is 10.80x versus 12.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Intuit's net margin of 4.25%. Intuit's return on equity of 16.84% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Intuit has a consensus price target of $697.18, signalling upside risk potential of 6.62%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $299.06 which suggests that it could grow by 15.39%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Intuit.

Intuit has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.835% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.683%.

Intuit has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.62%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuit pays 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intuit quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Intuit's net income of $471M is higher than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Intuit's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.00x while Workday's PE ratio is 132.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuit is 10.80x versus 8.26x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.