MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 17.09%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $505.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.24%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $364.33 which suggests that it could grow by 32.28%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.813%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.90x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 43.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.14x versus 7.08x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -8.72%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $505.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.24%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $409.77 which suggests that it could fall by -0.19%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.019%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.90x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.14x versus 25.80x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -33.19%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -32.41%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $505.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.24%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $195.17 which suggests that it could grow by 12.08%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Snowflake.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $986.8M. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$327.5M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.90x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.14x versus 15.98x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 4.25%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $505.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.24%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $299.06 which suggests that it could grow by 15.39%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.148% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.683%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.90x while Workday's PE ratio is 132.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.14x versus 8.26x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.