CRWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 36.86%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $409.77, signalling downside risk potential of -0.19%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $505.59 which suggests that it could grow by 15.24%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22.019% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 33.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 25.80x versus 12.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of -8.03%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -7.97%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $409.77, signalling downside risk potential of -0.19%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $144.25 which suggests that it could grow by 9%. Given that Cloudflare has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Cloudflare is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22.019% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.782, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.196%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $479.1M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Cloudflare's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 25.80x versus 25.66x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 3.37%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Okta's return on equity of 0.46%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $409.77, signalling downside risk potential of -0.19%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $118.25 which suggests that it could fall by -1.01%. Given that Okta has more downside risk than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe CrowdStrike Holdings is more attractive than Okta.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22.019% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.114%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $682M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Okta's net income of $23M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Okta's PE ratio is 2,986.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 25.80x versus 8.05x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -8.72% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 20.78%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $409.77, signalling downside risk potential of -0.19%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $178.12 which suggests that it could grow by 18.48%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22.019% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.667%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Oracle's PE ratio is 35.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 25.80x versus 7.70x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.