CRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of 15.68% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 36.86%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $351.10, signalling upside risk potential of 36.05%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $530.38 which suggests that it could grow by 5.38%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, which suggesting that the stock is 36.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Salesforce's net income of $1.5B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.39x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 38.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.49x versus 13.92x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of 15.68% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 9.01%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42% beat Okta's return on equity of 2.08%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $351.10, signalling upside risk potential of 36.05%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $122.36 which suggests that it could grow by 33.64%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Okta.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, which suggesting that the stock is 36.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.797%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $688M. Salesforce's net income of $1.5B is higher than Okta's net income of $62M. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.39x while Okta's PE ratio is 145.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.49x versus 6.13x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 15.68% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 15.4%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $351.10, signalling upside risk potential of 36.05%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $97.56 which suggests that it could grow by 2.28%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, which suggesting that the stock is 36.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.661%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Salesforce's net income of $1.5B is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.39x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 16.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.49x versus 4.50x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 15.68% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 3.04%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $351.10, signalling upside risk potential of 36.05%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $296.88 which suggests that it could grow by 29.71%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Workday.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, which suggesting that the stock is 36.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.122%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $9.8B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Salesforce's net income of $1.5B is higher than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.39x while Workday's PE ratio is 126.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.49x versus 7.10x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.