LINC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EpicQuest Education Group International has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Lincoln Educational Services's net margin of --. Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04% beat EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.17%. On the other hand EpicQuest Education Group International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 295.82%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.632, which suggesting that the stock is 63.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EpicQuest Education Group International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EpicQuest Education Group International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues of --. Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M is higher than EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of --. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.46x while EpicQuest Education Group International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services is 1.50x versus 0.98x for EpicQuest Education Group International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Covey has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Lincoln Educational Services's net margin of -1.81%. Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 23.44%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.17%. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of $41.67 which suggests that it could grow by 82.19%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.632, which suggesting that the stock is 63.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.911%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $59.6M. Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M is higher than Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.46x while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 17.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services is 1.50x versus 1.06x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Classover Holdings has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Lincoln Educational Services's net margin of -36.42%. Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04% beat Classover Holdings's return on equity of --.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.17%. On the other hand Classover Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.632, which suggesting that the stock is 63.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Classover Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Educational Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Classover Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than Classover Holdings quarterly revenues of $816K. Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M is higher than Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.46x while Classover Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services is 1.50x versus 18.96x for Classover Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Lincoln Educational Services's net margin of -8.26%. Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 17.17%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $24.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.46%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.632, which suggesting that the stock is 63.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.651, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.896%.

Lincoln Educational Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Lincoln Educational Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $236.2M. Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M is higher than Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, Lincoln Educational Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.46x while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 11.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Educational Services is 1.50x versus 2.16x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.