CHGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Covey has a net margin of -14.4% compared to Chegg's net margin of -1.81%. Chegg's return on equity of -225.39% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 23.44%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling downside risk potential of -23.08%. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of $41.67 which suggests that it could grow by 78.22%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Chegg, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Chegg.

Chegg has a beta of 1.780, which suggesting that the stock is 77.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.707%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $121.4M, which are larger than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $59.6M. Chegg's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 17.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.24x versus 1.09x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Classover Holdings has a net margin of -14.4% compared to Chegg's net margin of -36.42%. Chegg's return on equity of -225.39% beat Classover Holdings's return on equity of --.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling downside risk potential of -23.08%. On the other hand Classover Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chegg has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe Chegg is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

Chegg has a beta of 1.780, which suggesting that the stock is 77.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Classover Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Classover Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $121.4M, which are larger than Classover Holdings quarterly revenues of $816K. Chegg's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Classover Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.24x versus 17.98x for Classover Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of -14.4% compared to Chegg's net margin of -8.26%. Chegg's return on equity of -225.39% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling downside risk potential of -23.08%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $24.13 which suggests that it could grow by 4.44%. Given that Laureate Education has higher upside potential than Chegg, analysts believe Laureate Education is more attractive than Chegg.

Chegg has a beta of 1.780, which suggesting that the stock is 77.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.958%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $121.4M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $236.2M. Chegg's net income of -$17.5M is higher than Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 12.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.24x versus 2.29x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -14.4% compared to Chegg's net margin of 1.65%. Chegg's return on equity of -225.39% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $0.83, signalling downside risk potential of -23.08%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Chegg, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Chegg.

Chegg has a beta of 1.780, which suggesting that the stock is 77.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.917%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $121.4M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Chegg's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 61.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.24x versus 1.62x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.