KIDZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EpicQuest Education Group International has a net margin of -36.42% compared to Classover Holdings's net margin of --. Classover Holdings's return on equity of -- beat EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44%.

Classover Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EpicQuest Education Group International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 410.2%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Classover Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EpicQuest Education Group International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Classover Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EpicQuest Education Group International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Classover Holdings quarterly revenues are $816K, which are larger than EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues of --. Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K is higher than EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of --. Notably, Classover Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EpicQuest Education Group International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Classover Holdings is 18.28x versus 0.78x for EpicQuest Education Group International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Covey has a net margin of -36.42% compared to Classover Holdings's net margin of -1.81%. Classover Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 23.44%.

Classover Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of $41.67 which suggests that it could grow by 72.39%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.46%.

Classover Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Classover Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Classover Holdings quarterly revenues are $816K, which are smaller than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $59.6M. Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K is higher than Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Classover Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 18.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Classover Holdings is 18.28x versus 1.12x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of -36.42% compared to Classover Holdings's net margin of -8.26%. Classover Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19%.

Classover Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $24.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.75%. Given that Laureate Education has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe Laureate Education is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.344%.

Classover Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Classover Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Classover Holdings quarterly revenues are $816K, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $236.2M. Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K is higher than Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, Classover Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Classover Holdings is 18.28x versus 2.33x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -36.42% compared to Classover Holdings's net margin of 1.65%. Classover Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Classover Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.91%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.42%.

Classover Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Classover Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Classover Holdings quarterly revenues are $816K, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Classover Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 58.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Classover Holdings is 18.28x versus 1.54x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.