LAUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EpicQuest Education Group International has a net margin of -8.26% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of --. Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19% beat EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44%.

Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $24.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.77%. On the other hand EpicQuest Education Group International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 363.14%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Laureate Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EpicQuest Education Group International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education pays 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. EpicQuest Education Group International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Laureate Education quarterly revenues are $236.2M, which are larger than EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues of --. Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M is higher than EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of --. Notably, Laureate Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.59x while EpicQuest Education Group International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education is 2.16x versus 0.84x for EpicQuest Education Group International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Covey has a net margin of -8.26% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of -1.81%. Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 23.44%.

Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $24.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.77%. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of $41.67 which suggests that it could grow by 84.28%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.707%.

Laureate Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education pays 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Laureate Education quarterly revenues are $236.2M, which are larger than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $59.6M. Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M is lower than Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Laureate Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.59x while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education is 2.16x versus 1.05x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Classover Holdings has a net margin of -8.26% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of -36.42%. Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19% beat Classover Holdings's return on equity of --.

Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $24.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.77%. On the other hand Classover Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laureate Education has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe Laureate Education is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Laureate Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Classover Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education pays 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Classover Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Laureate Education quarterly revenues are $236.2M, which are larger than Classover Holdings quarterly revenues of $816K. Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M is lower than Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K. Notably, Laureate Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.59x while Classover Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education is 2.16x versus 25.01x for Classover Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -8.26% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of 1.65%. Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $24.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.77%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 19.28%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.917%.

Laureate Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education pays 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Laureate Education quarterly revenues are $236.2M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Laureate Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.59x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 55.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education is 2.16x versus 1.48x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.