FC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EpicQuest Education Group International has a net margin of -1.81% compared to Franklin Covey's net margin of --. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 23.44% beat EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44%.

Franklin Covey has a consensus price target of $41.67, signalling upside risk potential of 72.39%. On the other hand EpicQuest Education Group International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 410.2%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Franklin Covey, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Franklin Covey.

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.855, which suggesting that the stock is 14.46% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Franklin Covey has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EpicQuest Education Group International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Covey pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EpicQuest Education Group International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Covey quarterly revenues are $59.6M, which are larger than EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.1M is higher than EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Covey's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.17x while EpicQuest Education Group International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Covey is 1.12x versus 0.78x for EpicQuest Education Group International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Classover Holdings has a net margin of -1.81% compared to Franklin Covey's net margin of -36.42%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 23.44% beat Classover Holdings's return on equity of --.

Franklin Covey has a consensus price target of $41.67, signalling upside risk potential of 72.39%. On the other hand Classover Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Classover Holdings, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Classover Holdings.

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.855, which suggesting that the stock is 14.46% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Classover Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Franklin Covey has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Classover Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Covey pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Classover Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Covey quarterly revenues are $59.6M, which are larger than Classover Holdings quarterly revenues of $816K. Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Classover Holdings's net income of -$297.2K. Notably, Franklin Covey's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.17x while Classover Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Covey is 1.12x versus 18.28x for Classover Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of -1.81% compared to Franklin Covey's net margin of -8.26%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 23.44% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19%.

Franklin Covey has a consensus price target of $41.67, signalling upside risk potential of 72.39%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $24.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.75%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.855, which suggesting that the stock is 14.46% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.344%.

Franklin Covey has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Franklin Covey pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Covey quarterly revenues are $59.6M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $236.2M. Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, Franklin Covey's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.17x while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Covey is 1.12x versus 2.33x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -1.81% compared to Franklin Covey's net margin of 1.65%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 23.44% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Franklin Covey has a consensus price target of $41.67, signalling upside risk potential of 72.39%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.91%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.855, which suggesting that the stock is 14.46% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.42%.

Franklin Covey has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Covey pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Covey quarterly revenues are $59.6M, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Franklin Covey's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Franklin Covey's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.17x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 58.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Covey is 1.12x versus 1.54x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.