ADBE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 28.79% compared to Adobe's net margin of 15.68%. Adobe's return on equity of 50.48% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $493.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.18%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $353.19 which suggests that it could grow by 30.46%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Adobe, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Adobe.

Adobe has a beta of 1.548, which suggesting that the stock is 54.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.665%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.63x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 42.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.48x versus 6.80x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 28.79% compared to Adobe's net margin of 36.86%. Adobe's return on equity of 50.48% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $493.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.18%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $521.52 which suggests that it could grow by 4.84%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Microsoft.

Adobe has a beta of 1.548, which suggesting that the stock is 54.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.63x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 38.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.48x versus 13.76x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 28.79% compared to Adobe's net margin of 21.55%. Adobe's return on equity of 50.48% beat Oracle's return on equity of 85.26%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $493.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.18%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $212.87 which suggests that it could grow by 0.03%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Oracle.

Adobe has a beta of 1.548, which suggesting that the stock is 54.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.494%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $15.9B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.63x while Oracle's PE ratio is 49.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.48x versus 10.63x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 28.79% compared to Adobe's net margin of 3.04%. Adobe's return on equity of 50.48% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $493.43, signalling upside risk potential of 28.18%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $297.62 which suggests that it could grow by 27.48%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Workday.

Adobe has a beta of 1.548, which suggesting that the stock is 54.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.596%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is higher than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.63x while Workday's PE ratio is 128.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.48x versus 7.23x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.