KO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 14.22%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.74%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 16.52%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.461, which suggesting that the stock is 53.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.485, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.497%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.90x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 30.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.65x versus 2.91x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 23.89%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.74%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $62.3088 which suggests that it could fall by -2.5%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.461, which suggesting that the stock is 53.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.757%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.90x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 39.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.65x versus 8.51x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 10.24%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.74%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $150.06 which suggests that it could grow by 13.42%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.461, which suggesting that the stock is 53.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.381%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.90x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.65x versus 1.99x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellation Brands has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of -17.34%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.83, signalling upside risk potential of 7.74%. On the other hand Constellation Brands has an analysts' consensus of $216.29 which suggests that it could grow by 27.37%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.461, which suggesting that the stock is 53.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.677%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Constellation Brands offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands pays out -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Constellation Brands quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.90x while Constellation Brands's PE ratio is 49.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.65x versus 3.02x for Constellation Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.