MNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 23.89% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 14.22%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $60.3657, signalling downside risk potential of -1.04%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 15.13%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.516, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.415%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Monster Beverage's net income of $443M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.65x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 30.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 8.15x versus 2.94x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 23.89% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 29.92%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $60.3657, signalling downside risk potential of -1.04%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.48 which suggests that it could grow by 9.87%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.575%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Monster Beverage's net income of $443M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.65x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 8.15x versus 6.49x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 23.89% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 10.24%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $60.3657, signalling downside risk potential of -1.04%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.18%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Monster Beverage's net income of $443M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.65x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 8.15x versus 1.96x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Boston Beer has a net margin of 23.89% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 5.38%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09% beat Boston Beer's return on equity of 7.28%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $60.3657, signalling downside risk potential of -1.04%. On the other hand Boston Beer has an analysts' consensus of $262.94 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that Boston Beer has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Boston Beer is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer has a beta of 1.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.679%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boston Beer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Boston Beer quarterly revenues of $453.9M. Monster Beverage's net income of $443M is higher than Boston Beer's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.65x while Boston Beer's PE ratio is 40.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 8.15x versus 1.38x for Boston Beer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.