Financhill
Sell
32

STZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$160.58
Seasonality move :
4.15%
Day range:
$159.91 - $162.57
52-week range:
$160.46 - $265.70
Dividend yield:
2.49%
P/E ratio:
49.30x
P/S ratio:
2.90x
P/B ratio:
4.21x
Volume:
3.6M
Avg. volume:
2M
1-year change:
-38.8%
Market cap:
$29B
Revenue:
$10.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.51

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
STZ
Constellation Brands
$2.6B $3.39 -3.56% -28.77% $216.29
BF.B
Brown-Forman
$965.4M $0.34 -3.61% -8.76% $31.81
KO
Coca-Cola
$11.2B $0.72 1.45% 49.43% $77.83
PEP
PepsiCo
$17.7B $1.49 -0.98% -7.97% $149.70
SAM
Boston Beer
$435.2M $0.69 3.47% -5.01% $262.94
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
$2.4B $0.80 -3.64% -6.12% $63.06
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
STZ
Constellation Brands
$162.81 $216.29 $29B 49.30x $1.02 2.49% 2.90x
BF.B
Brown-Forman
$25.81 $31.81 $12.2B 14.03x $0.23 3.48% 3.07x
KO
Coca-Cola
$70.52 $77.83 $303.5B 28.21x $0.51 2.82% 6.49x
PEP
PepsiCo
$131.41 $149.70 $180.2B 19.33x $1.42 4.18% 1.98x
SAM
Boston Beer
$207.53 $262.94 $2.3B 34.42x $0.00 0% 1.18x
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
$49.62 $63.06 $10B 9.98x $0.47 3.67% 0.91x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
STZ
Constellation Brands
62.56% -0.042 36.47% 0.26x
BF.B
Brown-Forman
40.63% -0.310 16.63% 1.18x
KO
Coca-Cola
65.21% -0.010 15.85% 0.75x
PEP
PepsiCo
72.52% 0.108 23.55% 0.62x
SAM
Boston Beer
-- 0.051 -- 1.00x
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
32.27% 0.279 49.15% 0.46x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
STZ
Constellation Brands
$1.1B $609.4M -0.4% -0.93% -11.2% $312.1M
BF.B
Brown-Forman
$513M $232M 12.94% 23.48% 23.49% $102M
KO
Coca-Cola
$7B $3.7B 14.82% 39.18% 39.93% -$5.5B
PEP
PepsiCo
$10B $2.6B 14.47% 49.28% 14.54% -$1.6B
SAM
Boston Beer
$219.3M $33.8M 7.28% 7.28% 7.44% -$8M
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
$850.9M $197.7M 5.22% 7.7% 8.58% -$328M

Constellation Brands vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or BF.B?

    Brown-Forman has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 16.33%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat Brown-Forman's return on equity of 23.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman
    57.38% $0.31 $6.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.29, signalling upside risk potential of 32.85%. On the other hand Brown-Forman has an analysts' consensus of $31.81 which suggests that it could grow by 23.25%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Brown-Forman, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Brown-Forman.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    9 10 0
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman
    2 11 2
  • Is STZ or BF.B More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown-Forman has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.393%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Brown-Forman offers a yield of 3.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown-Forman pays out 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown-Forman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Brown-Forman quarterly revenues of $894M. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than Brown-Forman's net income of $146M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Brown-Forman's PE ratio is 14.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 2.90x versus 3.07x for Brown-Forman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    2.90x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman
    3.07x 14.03x $894M $146M
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or KO?

    Coca-Cola has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 29.92%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    62.59% $0.77 $76.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or KO?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.29, signalling upside risk potential of 32.85%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.83 which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    9 10 0
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    14 4 0
  • Is STZ or KO More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.874%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or KO?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or KO?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 2.90x versus 6.49x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    2.90x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    6.49x 28.21x $11.1B $3.3B
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or PEP?

    PepsiCo has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 10.24%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    55.77% $1.33 $67B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.29, signalling upside risk potential of 32.85%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $149.70 which suggests that it could grow by 13.92%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than PepsiCo.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    9 10 0
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    3 16 1
  • Is STZ or PEP More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.381%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 2.90x versus 1.98x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    2.90x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    1.98x 19.33x $17.9B $1.8B
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or SAM?

    Boston Beer has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 5.38%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat Boston Beer's return on equity of 7.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    SAM
    Boston Beer
    48.31% $2.16 $897M
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.29, signalling upside risk potential of 32.85%. On the other hand Boston Beer has an analysts' consensus of $262.94 which suggests that it could grow by 26.7%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Boston Beer, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Boston Beer.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    9 10 0
    SAM
    Boston Beer
    2 10 1
  • Is STZ or SAM More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.532%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Boston Beer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Boston Beer quarterly revenues of $453.9M. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than Boston Beer's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Boston Beer's PE ratio is 34.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 2.90x versus 1.18x for Boston Beer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    2.90x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    SAM
    Boston Beer
    1.18x 34.42x $453.9M $24.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or TAP?

    Molson Coors Beverage has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 5.25%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 7.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage
    36.93% $0.59 $19.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.29, signalling upside risk potential of 32.85%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $63.06 which suggests that it could grow by 27.09%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    9 10 0
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage
    4 14 1
  • Is STZ or TAP More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.703, which suggesting that the stock is 29.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.719, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.132%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Molson Coors Beverage offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage pays out 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $121M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Molson Coors Beverage's PE ratio is 9.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 2.90x versus 0.91x for Molson Coors Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    2.90x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage
    0.91x 9.98x $2.3B $121M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Reddit Stock Be In 5 Years?
Where Will Reddit Stock Be In 5 Years?

On a wet March morning last year, the famously orange…

Will Palantir Crash?
Will Palantir Crash?

AI and data analytics software major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has been…

Is Target’s Dividend Worth Buying?
Is Target’s Dividend Worth Buying?

Retail giant Target (NYSE:TGT) has been through an extremely volatile…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Sell
47
RGC alert for Jun 18

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 30.47% over the past day.

Sell
20
ENPH alert for Jun 18

Enphase Energy [ENPH] is down 23.99% over the past day.

Sell
26
FSLR alert for Jun 18

First Solar [FSLR] is down 17.97% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock