Why Did Ken Griffin Buy Sweetgreen Stock?
In Q1, Ken Griffin’s Citadel Advisors purchased nearly 1.3 million…
Sell
44
CELH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$42.07
Seasonality move
:
20.68%
Day range:
$41.63 - $43.11
52-week range:
$21.10 - $67.76
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
132.46x
P/S ratio:
7.48x
P/B ratio:
24.47x
Volume:
6.9M
Avg. volume:
7.8M
1-year change:
-36.08%
Market cap:
$10.8B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.32
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CELH
Celsius Holdings
|
$342.3M | $0.19 | 57.26% | -16.36% | $43.26 |
|
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
|
$3.6B | $0.38 | 5.46% | 27.9% | $38.62 |
|
KO
Coca-Cola
|
$11.2B | $0.72 | 1.45% | 49.43% | $77.83 |
|
MNST
Monster Beverage
|
$2B | $0.46 | 9.65% | 16.28% | $62.0178 |
|
PEP
PepsiCo
|
$17.7B | $1.49 | -0.98% | -7.97% | $150.06 |
|
SHOT
Safety Shot
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CELH
Celsius Holdings
|
$42.07 | $43.26 | $10.8B | 132.46x | $0.00 | 0% | 7.48x |
|
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
|
$32.86 | $38.62 | $44.6B | 29.87x | $0.23 | 2.75% | 2.88x |
|
KO
Coca-Cola
|
$72.07 | $77.83 | $310.2B | 28.83x | $0.51 | 2.73% | 6.64x |
|
MNST
Monster Beverage
|
$62.5900 | $62.0178 | $61B | 38.64x | $0.00 | 0% | 8.37x |
|
PEP
PepsiCo
|
$131.83 | $150.06 | $180.7B | 19.39x | $1.42 | 4.16% | 1.98x |
|
SHOT
Safety Shot
|
$0.27 | -- | $20.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 15.45x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CELH
Celsius Holdings
|
-- | -2.547 | -- | 2.95x |
|
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
|
39.45% | -0.081 | 34.94% | 0.24x |
|
KO
Coca-Cola
|
65.21% | -0.010 | 15.85% | 0.75x |
|
MNST
Monster Beverage
|
2.96% | -0.259 | 0.35% | 2.66x |
|
PEP
PepsiCo
|
72.52% | 0.108 | 23.55% | 0.62x |
|
SHOT
Safety Shot
|
111.2% | -0.633 | 19.69% | 0.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CELH
Celsius Holdings
|
$172.4M | $52M | 9.09% | 9.09% | 15.8% | $96.4M |
|
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
|
$2B | $801M | 3.78% | 6.11% | 22.23% | $75M |
|
KO
Coca-Cola
|
$7B | $3.7B | 14.82% | 39.18% | 39.93% | -$5.5B |
|
MNST
Monster Beverage
|
$1B | $569.7M | 21.71% | 23.09% | 31.38% | $473.2M |
|
PEP
PepsiCo
|
$10B | $2.6B | 14.47% | 49.28% | 14.54% | -$1.6B |
|
SHOT
Safety Shot
|
$21K | -$5.4M | -643.71% | -1243.79% | -12407.03% | -$4.7M |
Celsius Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or KDP?
Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 14.22%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings52.35% $0.15 $1.3B KDPKeurig Dr Pepper54.61% $0.38 $40.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or KDP?
Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings7 6 0 KDPKeurig Dr Pepper9 7 0 -
Is CELH or KDP More Risky?
Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.095% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.485, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.497%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or KDP?
Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or KDP?
Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 132.46x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 29.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.48x versus 2.88x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings7.48x 132.46x $329.3M $44.4M KDPKeurig Dr Pepper2.88x 29.87x $3.6B $517M
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or KO?
Coca-Cola has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 29.92%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings52.35% $0.15 $1.3B KOCoca-Cola62.59% $0.77 $76.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or KO?
Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.99%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings7 6 0 KOCoca-Cola14 4 0 -
Is CELH or KO More Risky?
Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.095% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.874%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or KO?
Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or KO?
Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 132.46x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.48x versus 6.64x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings7.48x 132.46x $329.3M $44.4M KOCoca-Cola6.64x 28.83x $11.1B $3.3B
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or MNST?
Monster Beverage has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 23.89%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings52.35% $0.15 $1.3B MNSTMonster Beverage56.51% $0.45 $6.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or MNST?
Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $62.0178 which suggests that it could fall by -1.82%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Monster Beverage.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings7 6 0 MNSTMonster Beverage11 9 1 -
Is CELH or MNST More Risky?
Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.095% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.757%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or MNST?
Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or MNST?
Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 132.46x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 38.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.48x versus 8.37x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings7.48x 132.46x $329.3M $44.4M MNSTMonster Beverage8.37x 38.64x $1.9B $443M
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or PEP?
PepsiCo has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 10.24%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings52.35% $0.15 $1.3B PEPPepsiCo55.77% $1.33 $67B -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or PEP?
Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $150.06 which suggests that it could grow by 13.83%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings7 6 0 PEPPepsiCo4 16 1 -
Is CELH or PEP More Risky?
Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.095% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.381%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or PEP?
Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or PEP?
Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 132.46x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.48x versus 1.98x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings7.48x 132.46x $329.3M $44.4M PEPPepsiCo1.98x 19.39x $17.9B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns CELH or SHOT?
Safety Shot has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of -12652.75%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Safety Shot's return on equity of -1243.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CELHCelsius Holdings52.35% $0.15 $1.3B SHOTSafety Shot49.85% -$0.08 $4.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CELH or SHOT?
Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.26, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Safety Shot has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1124.49%. Given that Safety Shot has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Safety Shot is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CELHCelsius Holdings7 6 0 SHOTSafety Shot0 0 0 -
Is CELH or SHOT More Risky?
Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.095% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Shot has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CELH or SHOT?
Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safety Shot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Shot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CELH or SHOT?
Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are larger than Safety Shot quarterly revenues of $42.1K. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is higher than Safety Shot's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 132.46x while Safety Shot's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 7.48x versus 15.45x for Safety Shot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CELHCelsius Holdings7.48x 132.46x $329.3M $44.4M SHOTSafety Shot15.45x -- $42.1K -$5.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Planet Labs’ Stock Go Next?
On 4 June 2025 Planet reported Q1 FY 2026 revenue of $66.3 million, up 10% year over…
Where Will VICI Properties Be in 5 Years?
VICI Properties (NYSE:VICI) is a real estate investment trust focused…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
73
OKLO alert for Jun 12
Oklo [OKLO] is up 29.48% over the past day.
Buy
87
SMR alert for Jun 12
NuScale Power [SMR] is up 20.55% over the past day.
Buy
53
PLAY alert for Jun 12
Dave & Buster's Entertainment [PLAY] is up 17.78% over the past day.
