CELH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 15.83%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 18.53% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 9.08%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $40.16, signalling upside risk potential of 46.77%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.85 which suggests that it could grow by 16.63%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Keurig Dr Pepper, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Keurig Dr Pepper.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.761, which suggesting that the stock is 76.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.118%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 12.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 52.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $265.7M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $6.4M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $616M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.13x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 19.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 4.72x versus 2.95x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 24.03%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 18.53% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $40.16, signalling upside risk potential of 46.77%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.53 which suggests that it could grow by 17.01%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.761, which suggesting that the stock is 76.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.255%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 12.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $265.7M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $6.4M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.13x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 4.72x versus 5.86x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 19.72%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 18.53% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $40.16, signalling upside risk potential of 46.77%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $55.2884 which suggests that it could grow by 5.29%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.761, which suggesting that the stock is 76.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.246%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 12.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $265.7M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $6.4M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.13x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 33.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 4.72x versus 7.31x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 12.57%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 18.53% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $40.16, signalling upside risk potential of 46.77%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $180.27 which suggests that it could grow by 17.97%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than PepsiCo.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.761, which suggesting that the stock is 76.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.414%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 12.11% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $265.7M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $23.3B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $6.4M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.13x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 4.72x versus 2.29x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.