KMX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a net margin of 2.02% compared to CarMax's net margin of -2965.78%. CarMax's return on equity of 7.51% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -31.54%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $87.70, signalling upside risk potential of 3.29%. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1516.16%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than CarMax.

CarMax has a beta of 1.705, which suggesting that the stock is 70.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues of $61.2K. CarMax's net income of $125.4M is higher than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.78x while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's PE ratio is 4.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.51x versus 0.37x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 2.02% compared to CarMax's net margin of 2.25%. CarMax's return on equity of 7.51% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 18.42%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $87.70, signalling upside risk potential of 3.29%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $320.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.21%. Given that Group 1 Automotive has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Group 1 Automotive is more attractive than CarMax.

CarMax has a beta of 1.705, which suggesting that the stock is 70.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.217%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.2B. CarMax's net income of $125.4M is higher than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $117.3M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.78x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.51x versus 0.30x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of 2.02% compared to CarMax's net margin of 6.33%. CarMax's return on equity of 7.51% beat Openlane's return on equity of 5.43%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $87.70, signalling upside risk potential of 3.29%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.13%. Given that Openlane has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Openlane is more attractive than CarMax.

CarMax has a beta of 1.705, which suggesting that the stock is 70.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.882%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out -28.81% of its earnings as a dividend.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Openlane quarterly revenues of $448.4M. CarMax's net income of $125.4M is higher than Openlane's net income of $28.4M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.78x while Openlane's PE ratio is 110.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.51x versus 1.32x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 2.02% compared to CarMax's net margin of -9.83%. CarMax's return on equity of 7.51% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -42.93%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $87.70, signalling upside risk potential of 3.29%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -52.72%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

CarMax has a beta of 1.705, which suggesting that the stock is 70.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.082, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.195%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.5M. CarMax's net income of $125.4M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.78x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.51x versus 2.13x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.