GPI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cars.com has a net margin of 2.33% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of -1.12%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4% beat Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14%.

Group 1 Automotive has a consensus price target of $463.88, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand Cars.com has an analysts' consensus of $16.21 which suggests that it could grow by 59.75%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cars.com has a beta of 1.952, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.174%.

Group 1 Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Cars.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Group 1 Automotive pays 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cars.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Cars.com quarterly revenues of $179M. Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M is higher than Cars.com's net income of -$2M. Notably, Group 1 Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.93x while Cars.com's PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Group 1 Automotive is 0.27x versus 0.94x for Cars.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of 2.33% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of 8.02%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4% beat Openlane's return on equity of 9.57%.

Group 1 Automotive has a consensus price target of $463.88, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $23.83 which suggests that it could grow by 4.21%. Given that Group 1 Automotive has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Group 1 Automotive is more attractive than Openlane.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.316, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.625%.

Group 1 Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Group 1 Automotive pays 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Openlane quarterly revenues of $460.1M. Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M is higher than Openlane's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Group 1 Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.93x while Openlane's PE ratio is 39.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Group 1 Automotive is 0.27x versus 1.36x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 2.33% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of -11.23%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41%.

Group 1 Automotive has a consensus price target of $463.88, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.21%. Given that Group 1 Automotive has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Group 1 Automotive is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.603%.

Group 1 Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Group 1 Automotive pays 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.7M. Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Group 1 Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.93x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Group 1 Automotive is 0.27x versus 3.08x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 2.33% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of 1.5%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Group 1 Automotive has a consensus price target of $463.88, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $84.13 which suggests that it could grow by 33.54%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.765%.

Group 1 Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Group 1 Automotive pays 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M is higher than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Group 1 Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.93x while CarMax's PE ratio is 19.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Group 1 Automotive is 0.27x versus 0.37x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.