KAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a net margin of 6.33% compared to Openlane's net margin of -2965.78%. Openlane's return on equity of 5.43% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -31.54%.

Openlane has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.13%. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1516.16%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Openlane.

Openlane has a beta of 1.529, which suggesting that the stock is 52.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Openlane has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Openlane pays -28.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Openlane quarterly revenues are $448.4M, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues of $61.2K. Openlane's net income of $28.4M is higher than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Openlane's price-to-earnings ratio is 110.03x while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's PE ratio is 4.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Openlane is 1.32x versus 0.37x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 6.33% compared to Openlane's net margin of 2.25%. Openlane's return on equity of 5.43% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 18.42%.

Openlane has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.13%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $320.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.21%. Given that Openlane has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe Openlane is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

Openlane has a beta of 1.529, which suggesting that the stock is 52.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.217%.

Openlane has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Openlane pays -28.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Openlane quarterly revenues are $448.4M, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Openlane's net income of $28.4M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $117.3M. Notably, Openlane's price-to-earnings ratio is 110.03x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Openlane is 1.32x versus 0.30x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 6.33% compared to Openlane's net margin of -9.83%. Openlane's return on equity of 5.43% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -42.93%.

Openlane has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.13%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -52.72%. Given that Openlane has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Openlane is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Openlane has a beta of 1.529, which suggesting that the stock is 52.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.082, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.195%.

Openlane has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Openlane pays -28.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Openlane quarterly revenues are $448.4M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.5M. Openlane's net income of $28.4M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Openlane's price-to-earnings ratio is 110.03x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Openlane is 1.32x versus 2.13x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 6.33% compared to Openlane's net margin of 2.02%. Openlane's return on equity of 5.43% beat CarMax's return on equity of 7.51%.

Openlane has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.13%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $87.70 which suggests that it could grow by 3.29%. Given that Openlane has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Openlane is more attractive than CarMax.

Openlane has a beta of 1.529, which suggesting that the stock is 52.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.54%.

Openlane has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Openlane pays -28.81% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Openlane quarterly revenues are $448.4M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Openlane's net income of $28.4M is lower than CarMax's net income of $125.4M. Notably, Openlane's price-to-earnings ratio is 110.03x while CarMax's PE ratio is 28.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Openlane is 1.32x versus 0.51x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.