DRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 3.47%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 36.82%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $193.25, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $36.13 which suggests that it could grow by 4.09%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.482, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.223%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 52.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $865.5M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M is higher than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $30M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.17x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 18.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.91x versus 0.65x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dine Brands Global has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 9.77%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $193.25, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Dine Brands Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.25%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.537%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Dine Brands Global offers a yield of 6.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 32.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues of $195M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M is higher than Dine Brands Global's net income of $19.1M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.17x while Dine Brands Global's PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.91x versus 0.54x for Dine Brands Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 3.38%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85% beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $193.25, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $118.69 which suggests that it could fall by -10.82%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Brinker International.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.520, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.993%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.17x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 32.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.91x versus 1.34x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 20.92%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $193.25, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $145.81 which suggests that it could grow by 7.48%. Given that Yum Brands has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Yum Brands is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.498% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.305%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 42.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $382M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.17x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 25.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.91x versus 5.28x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.