DRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 1.53%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's return on equity of 12.91%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $213.83, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has an analysts' consensus of $54.83 which suggests that it could grow by 5.33%. Given that Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Cracker Barrel Old Country Store is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.334% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.323%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays out 283.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's is not.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store quarterly revenues of $821.1M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's net income of $12.6M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.52x while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's PE ratio is 20.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.20x versus 0.33x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 8.36%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $213.83, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $165.96 which suggests that it could fall by -4.93%. Given that Brinker International has more downside risk than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Brinker International.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.334% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 1.709, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.92%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.52x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 24.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.20x versus 1.57x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McDonald's has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 31.37%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat McDonald's's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $213.83, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand McDonald's has an analysts' consensus of $328.75 which suggests that it could grow by 8.89%. Given that McDonald's has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe McDonald's is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.334% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McDonald's has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.455%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. McDonald's offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's pays out 59.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than McDonald's quarterly revenues of $6B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is lower than McDonald's's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.52x while McDonald's's PE ratio is 26.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.20x versus 8.46x for McDonald's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 14.16%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $213.83, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $159.64 which suggests that it could grow by 10.86%. Given that Yum Brands has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Yum Brands is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.334% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.185%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.52x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 28.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.20x versus 5.29x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.