KFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of -11.23% compared to Kingsway Financial Services's net margin of 2.33%. Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -66.19%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $463.88 which suggests that it could grow by 8.91%. Given that Group 1 Automotive has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Group 1 Automotive is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.174, which suggesting that the stock is 82.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.147%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kingsway Financial Services pays -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M. Notably, Kingsway Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsway Financial Services is 2.81x versus 0.27x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of -11.23% compared to Kingsway Financial Services's net margin of 8.02%. Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41% beat Openlane's return on equity of 9.57%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -66.19%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $23.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.84%. Given that Openlane has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Openlane is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.174, which suggesting that the stock is 82.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.316, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.625%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsway Financial Services pays -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than Openlane quarterly revenues of $460.1M. Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Openlane's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Kingsway Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Openlane's PE ratio is 37.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsway Financial Services is 2.81x versus 1.31x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of -11.23% compared to Kingsway Financial Services's net margin of 1.5%. Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -66.19%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $84.19 which suggests that it could grow by 35.21%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.174, which suggesting that the stock is 82.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.765%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsway Financial Services pays -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M is lower than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Kingsway Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CarMax's PE ratio is 19.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsway Financial Services is 2.81x versus 0.37x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prestige Cars International has a net margin of -11.23% compared to Kingsway Financial Services's net margin of --. Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41% beat Prestige Cars International's return on equity of --.

Kingsway Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -66.19%. On the other hand Prestige Cars International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingsway Financial Services has higher upside potential than Prestige Cars International, analysts believe Kingsway Financial Services is more attractive than Prestige Cars International.

Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.174, which suggesting that the stock is 82.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prestige Cars International has a beta of 2.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.159%.

Kingsway Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prestige Cars International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingsway Financial Services pays -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Prestige Cars International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are larger than Prestige Cars International quarterly revenues of --. Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M is higher than Prestige Cars International's net income of --. Notably, Kingsway Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prestige Cars International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingsway Financial Services is 2.81x versus -- for Prestige Cars International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.