SPB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 14.05%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.11%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $98.77 which suggests that it could grow by 8.74%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.39100000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.596%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $700.2M, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.62x versus 3.74x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interparfums has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 12.54%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Interparfums's return on equity of 17.47%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.11%. On the other hand Interparfums has an analysts' consensus of $159.50 which suggests that it could grow by 33.12%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Interparfums, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Interparfums.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.39100000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interparfums has a beta of 1.327, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.747%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Interparfums offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums pays out 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $700.2M, which are larger than Interparfums quarterly revenues of $338.8M. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M is lower than Interparfums's net income of $42.5M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while Interparfums's PE ratio is 23.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.62x versus 2.63x for Interparfums. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 11.72%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.11%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $142.94 which suggests that it could grow by 7.04%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.39100000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.407%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $700.2M, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.62x versus 2.27x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 19.06%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.11%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.51 which suggests that it could grow by 8.11%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.39100000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $700.2M, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.75x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.62x versus 4.65x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.