GM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of 10.01%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $54.15, signalling upside risk potential of 10.38%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $28.62 which suggests that it could grow by 16.96%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.003% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.502%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $1.3B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.83x while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 9.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.28x versus 0.66x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -155.79%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $54.15, signalling upside risk potential of 10.38%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 15.42%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.003% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.83x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.28x versus 6.62x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -43.95%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $54.15, signalling upside risk potential of 10.38%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could grow by 2.48%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

General Motors has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.003% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.83x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.28x versus 3.02x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of 2.12%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $54.15, signalling upside risk potential of 10.38%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -13.04%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

General Motors has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.003% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.83x while Tesla's PE ratio is 189.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.28x versus 12.61x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.