LCID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -155.79% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of --. Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of --.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.53, signalling upside risk potential of 0.71%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8067127.7%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $235M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of --. Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of --. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 7.58x versus 50.74x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of -155.79% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of 6.32%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.53, signalling upside risk potential of 0.71%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.39 which suggests that it could grow by 14.5%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.127%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $235M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 7.58x versus 0.27x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -155.79% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -43.95%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.53, signalling upside risk potential of 0.71%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.06 which suggests that it could fall by -1.41%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $235M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 7.58x versus 3.00x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -155.79% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of 2.12%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.53, signalling upside risk potential of 0.71%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could fall by -2.96%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $235M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 163.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 7.58x versus 10.92x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.