TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of 6.32%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $289.44, signalling downside risk potential of -2.96%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.39 which suggests that it could grow by 14.5%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.429, which suggesting that the stock is 142.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.127%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Tesla's net income of $409M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 163.88x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 10.92x versus 0.27x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of 10.01%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $289.44, signalling downside risk potential of -2.96%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $28.36 which suggests that it could grow by 20.05%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.429, which suggesting that the stock is 142.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.281%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 163.88x while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 8.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 10.92x versus 0.64x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of -155.79%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $289.44, signalling downside risk potential of -2.96%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 0.71%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.429, which suggesting that the stock is 142.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 163.88x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 10.92x versus 7.58x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of -43.95%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $289.44, signalling downside risk potential of -2.96%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.06 which suggests that it could fall by -1.41%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.429, which suggesting that the stock is 142.869% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 163.88x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 10.92x versus 3.00x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.