TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of 6.32%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $304.17, signalling downside risk potential of -2.98%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $55.27 which suggests that it could grow by 3.63%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.394, which suggesting that the stock is 139.423% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.192%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Tesla's net income of $409M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 172.26x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 11.48x versus 0.31x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of -155.79%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $304.17, signalling downside risk potential of -2.98%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.52 which suggests that it could grow by 11.15%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.394, which suggesting that the stock is 139.423% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 172.26x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 11.48x versus 6.86x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of -43.95%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $304.17, signalling downside risk potential of -2.98%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.88 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.394, which suggesting that the stock is 139.423% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 172.26x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 11.48x versus 2.74x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of 2.27%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.37%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $304.17, signalling downside risk potential of -2.98%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $40.47 which suggests that it could grow by 21.43%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.394, which suggesting that the stock is 139.423% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.444%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $775.1M. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of $17.6M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 172.26x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 11.48x versus 0.35x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.