Financhill
Sell
33

BEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$21.38
Seasonality move :
1.8%
Day range:
$21.25 - $21.52
52-week range:
$16.25 - $24.37
Dividend yield:
5.9%
P/E ratio:
31.41x
P/S ratio:
1.27x
P/B ratio:
0.91x
Volume:
3.7M
Avg. volume:
5.4M
1-year change:
-8.91%
Market cap:
$11.2B
Revenue:
$8.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.68

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BEN
Franklin Resources
$2.4B $0.47 12.28% 50.8% $20.00
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
$857.3M $0.78 595.68% -24% $37.93
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group
$497.6M $5.09 1.7% 132.36% $200.00
FHI
Federated Hermes
$422.7M $0.92 5.74% 393.77% $42.00
LAZ
Lazard
$654.1M $0.36 -3.85% -29.16% $43.33
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
$1.8B $2.13 -1.11% -5.11% $93.62
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BEN
Franklin Resources
$21.36 $20.00 $11.2B 31.41x $0.32 5.9% 1.27x
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
$39.98 $37.93 $4.4B 10.76x $0.80 8.33% 9.86x
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group
$179.69 $200.00 $5.1B 13.65x $0.01 0.02% 3.12x
FHI
Federated Hermes
$42.27 $42.00 $3.3B 11.91x $0.34 3.01% 2.00x
LAZ
Lazard
$43.22 $43.33 $4.1B 15.06x $0.50 4.63% 1.51x
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
$93.79 $93.62 $20.7B 10.63x $1.27 5.32% 2.94x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BEN
Franklin Resources
49.71% 1.463 94.27% 3.96x
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
-- 0.036 -- --
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group
45.12% 0.213 42.87% 2.10x
FHI
Federated Hermes
24.45% 0.193 10.58% 2.89x
LAZ
Lazard
73.68% 2.103 40.13% 4.51x
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
-- 1.688 -- 5.87x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BEN
Franklin Resources
$1.7B $220.9M 1.49% 2.7% 3.01% -$87.6M
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
-- -- 20.44% 20.44% 100% $115.3M
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group
$266.3M $85.5M 5.99% 9.3% 32.36% $207.3M
FHI
Federated Hermes
$280.3M $135M 19.79% 25.83% 32.87% $13.3M
LAZ
Lazard
$227.2M $64.1M 12.35% 44.87% 11.52% -$231.4M
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
$922M $625M 18.11% 18.11% 35.43% $550.9M

Franklin Resources vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BEN or AB?

    AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 89.46%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat AllianceBernstein Holding LP's return on equity of 20.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    78.88% $0.26 $27.4B
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    -- $0.67 $2B
  • What do Analysts Say About BEN or AB?

    Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand AllianceBernstein Holding LP has an analysts' consensus of $37.93 which suggests that it could fall by -5.13%. Given that Franklin Resources has more downside risk than AllianceBernstein Holding LP, analysts believe AllianceBernstein Holding LP is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1 6 2
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    1 5 0
  • Is BEN or AB More Risky?

    Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AllianceBernstein Holding LP has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.735%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BEN or AB?

    Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. AllianceBernstein Holding LP offers a yield of 8.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. AllianceBernstein Holding LP pays out 80.6% of its earnings as a dividend. AllianceBernstein Holding LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BEN or AB?

    Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than AllianceBernstein Holding LP quarterly revenues of $82.8M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than AllianceBernstein Holding LP's net income of $74M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while AllianceBernstein Holding LP's PE ratio is 10.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 9.86x for AllianceBernstein Holding LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1.27x 31.41x $2.1B $151.4M
    AB
    AllianceBernstein Holding LP
    9.86x 10.76x $82.8M $74M
  • Which has Higher Returns BEN or AMG?

    Affiliated Managers Group has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 14.58%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Affiliated Managers Group's return on equity of 9.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    78.88% $0.26 $27.4B
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group
    53.63% $2.20 $7.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BEN or AMG?

    Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group has an analysts' consensus of $200.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.3%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1 6 2
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group
    3 3 0
  • Is BEN or AMG More Risky?

    Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.25%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BEN or AMG?

    Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Affiliated Managers Group offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group pays out 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BEN or AMG?

    Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Affiliated Managers Group quarterly revenues of $496.6M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than Affiliated Managers Group's net income of $72.4M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while Affiliated Managers Group's PE ratio is 13.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 3.12x for Affiliated Managers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1.27x 31.41x $2.1B $151.4M
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group
    3.12x 13.65x $496.6M $72.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns BEN or FHI?

    Federated Hermes has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 23.88%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    78.88% $0.26 $27.4B
    FHI
    Federated Hermes
    66.17% $1.25 $1.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About BEN or FHI?

    Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand Federated Hermes has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.64%. Given that Franklin Resources has more downside risk than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1 6 2
    FHI
    Federated Hermes
    1 6 0
  • Is BEN or FHI More Risky?

    Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.019%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BEN or FHI?

    Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Federated Hermes offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BEN or FHI?

    Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Federated Hermes quarterly revenues of $423.5M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while Federated Hermes's PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 2.00x for Federated Hermes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1.27x 31.41x $2.1B $151.4M
    FHI
    Federated Hermes
    2.00x 11.91x $423.5M $101.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns BEN or LAZ?

    Lazard has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 9.18%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Lazard's return on equity of 44.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    78.88% $0.26 $27.4B
    LAZ
    Lazard
    34.56% $0.56 $2.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About BEN or LAZ?

    Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand Lazard has an analysts' consensus of $43.33 which suggests that it could grow by 0.26%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1 6 2
    LAZ
    Lazard
    2 3 1
  • Is BEN or LAZ More Risky?

    Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.976%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BEN or LAZ?

    Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Lazard offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BEN or LAZ?

    Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Lazard quarterly revenues of $657.5M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than Lazard's net income of $60.4M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while Lazard's PE ratio is 15.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 1.51x for Lazard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1.27x 31.41x $2.1B $151.4M
    LAZ
    Lazard
    1.51x 15.06x $657.5M $60.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns BEN or TROW?

    T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 27.81%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    78.88% $0.26 $27.4B
    TROW
    T. Rowe Price Group
    52.27% $2.15 $11.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About BEN or TROW?

    Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.62 which suggests that it could fall by -0.19%. Given that Franklin Resources has more downside risk than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1 6 2
    TROW
    T. Rowe Price Group
    0 9 0
  • Is BEN or TROW More Risky?

    Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.452%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BEN or TROW?

    Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BEN or TROW?

    Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 2.94x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1.27x 31.41x $2.1B $151.4M
    TROW
    T. Rowe Price Group
    2.94x 10.63x $1.8B $490.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is It Time to Sell MercadoLibre?
Is It Time to Sell MercadoLibre?

MercadoLibre (NASDAQ:MELI) has earned a reputation for being not dissimilar…

Is Tesla Stock High Risk or High Reward?
Is Tesla Stock High Risk or High Reward?

EV-making supergiant Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is going through a difficult…

Why Did Chase Coleman Buy TSM?
Why Did Chase Coleman Buy TSM?

Billionaire Chase Coleman of Tiger Global Management has built a…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
80
GWRE alert for Jun 5

Guidewire Software [GWRE] is up 0.69% over the past day.

Buy
60
REVG alert for Jun 5

REV Group [REVG] is down 0% over the past day.

Buy
55
SIG alert for Jun 5

Signet Jewelers [SIG] is down 0.67% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock