BEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Affiliated Managers Group has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 14.58%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Affiliated Managers Group's return on equity of 9.3%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group has an analysts' consensus of $200.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.3%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.25%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Affiliated Managers Group offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group pays out 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Affiliated Managers Group quarterly revenues of $496.6M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than Affiliated Managers Group's net income of $72.4M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while Affiliated Managers Group's PE ratio is 13.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 3.12x for Affiliated Managers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 23.88%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand Federated Hermes has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.64%. Given that Franklin Resources has more downside risk than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.019%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Federated Hermes offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Federated Hermes quarterly revenues of $423.5M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while Federated Hermes's PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 2.00x for Federated Hermes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazard has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 9.18%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Lazard's return on equity of 44.87%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand Lazard has an analysts' consensus of $43.33 which suggests that it could grow by 0.26%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.976%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. Lazard offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Lazard quarterly revenues of $657.5M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than Lazard's net income of $60.4M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while Lazard's PE ratio is 15.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 1.51x for Lazard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 27.81%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.37%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.62 which suggests that it could fall by -0.19%. Given that Franklin Resources has more downside risk than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.552% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.452%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.9%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.41x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.27x versus 2.94x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.