FHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

US Global Investors has a net margin of 21.43% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 14.6%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.19% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 3.67%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $42.88, signalling upside risk potential of 3.86%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.836, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.562%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Federated Hermes pays 32.81% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $408.5M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Federated Hermes's net income of $87.5M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of $315K. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.27x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 19.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.07x versus 3.40x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 21.43% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of -7.31%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.19% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of -1.82%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $42.88, signalling upside risk potential of 3.86%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.231%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Federated Hermes pays 32.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 100.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Principal Financial Group's is not.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $408.5M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Federated Hermes's net income of $87.5M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of -$220M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.27x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.07x versus 1.31x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Raymond James Financial has a net margin of 21.43% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 17.64%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.19% beat Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $42.88, signalling upside risk potential of 3.86%. On the other hand Raymond James Financial has an analysts' consensus of $155.14 which suggests that it could fall by -1.36%. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than Raymond James Financial.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.25299999999999%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Raymond James Financial offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Federated Hermes pays 32.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Raymond James Financial pays out 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $408.5M, which are smaller than Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Federated Hermes's net income of $87.5M is lower than Raymond James Financial's net income of $602M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.27x while Raymond James Financial's PE ratio is 16.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.07x versus 2.64x for Raymond James Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 21.43% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 28.82%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.19% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $42.88, signalling upside risk potential of 3.86%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $80.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.33%. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than SEI Investments.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.522% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Federated Hermes pays 32.81% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $408.5M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Federated Hermes's net income of $87.5M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.27x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.07x versus 5.43x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.