FHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Resources has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 7.17%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83% beat Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $42.29, signalling downside risk potential of -2.77%. On the other hand Franklin Resources has an analysts' consensus of $20.27 which suggests that it could fall by -12.66%. Given that Franklin Resources has more downside risk than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.790, which suggesting that the stock is 21.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.552%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Franklin Resources offers a yield of 5.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Resources pays out 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $423.5M, which are smaller than Franklin Resources quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M is lower than Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.25x while Franklin Resources's PE ratio is 34.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.06x versus 1.38x for Franklin Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evercore has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 21.04%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83% beat Evercore's return on equity of 24.79%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $42.29, signalling downside risk potential of -2.77%. On the other hand Evercore has an analysts' consensus of $248.00 which suggests that it could fall by -7.14%. Given that Evercore has more downside risk than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than Evercore.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.790, which suggesting that the stock is 21.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.557%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Evercore offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore pays out 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $423.5M, which are smaller than Evercore quarterly revenues of $694.8M. Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M is lower than Evercore's net income of $146.2M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.25x while Evercore's PE ratio is 25.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.06x versus 3.62x for Evercore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of -18.17%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $42.29, signalling downside risk potential of -2.77%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.790, which suggesting that the stock is 21.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.415, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.472%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $423.5M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$382K. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.25x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 79.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.06x versus 3.71x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 1.3%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $42.29, signalling downside risk potential of -2.77%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $82.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.06%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.790, which suggesting that the stock is 21.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.21099999999999%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $423.5M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.25x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 16.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.06x versus 1.13x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.