LAZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evercore has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of 21.04%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat Evercore's return on equity of 24.79%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of $43.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand Evercore has an analysts' consensus of $228.43 which suggests that it could fall by -4.87%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than Evercore, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than Evercore.

Lazard has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.557%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.64%. Evercore offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore pays out 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are smaller than Evercore quarterly revenues of $694.8M. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is lower than Evercore's net income of $146.2M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Evercore's PE ratio is 22.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.51x versus 3.25x for Evercore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of -18.17%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of $43.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Lazard has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.415, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.472%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.64%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$382K. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 79.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.51x versus 3.58x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of 27.48%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of $43.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $84.83 which suggests that it could grow by 2.22%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Lazard.

Lazard has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.863%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.64%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 18.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.51x versus 5.02x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of 27.81%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of $43.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.45%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.08 which suggests that it could grow by 2.73%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Lazard.

Lazard has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.976% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.452%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.64%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.51x versus 2.87x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.