LAZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evercore has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Lazard's net margin of 10.68%. Lazard's return on equity of 43.33% beat Evercore's return on equity of 18.66%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.88%. On the other hand Evercore has an analysts' consensus of $332.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.99%. Given that Evercore has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe Evercore is more attractive than Lazard.

Lazard has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.566% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore has a beta of 1.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.35%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Evercore offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Lazard pays -229.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore pays out 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $792.4M, which are larger than Evercore quarterly revenues of $734.2M. Lazard's net income of $107.9M is higher than Evercore's net income of $78.4M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.69x while Evercore's PE ratio is 35.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.66x versus 4.12x for Evercore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Lazard's net margin of 14.6%. Lazard's return on equity of 43.33% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 3.67%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.88%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Lazard has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.566% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.836, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.562%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lazard pays -229.3% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $792.4M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Lazard's net income of $107.9M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of $315K. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.69x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 19.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.66x versus 3.40x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Lazard's net margin of -7.31%. Lazard's return on equity of 43.33% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of -1.82%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.88%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Lazard.

Lazard has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.566% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.231%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Lazard pays -229.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 100.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $792.4M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Lazard's net income of $107.9M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of -$220M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.69x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.66x versus 1.31x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Lazard's net margin of 28.82%. Lazard's return on equity of 43.33% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Lazard has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.88%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $80.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.33%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than SEI Investments.

Lazard has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.566% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Lazard pays -229.3% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lazard quarterly revenues are $792.4M, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Lazard's net income of $107.9M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.69x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.66x versus 5.43x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.