TROW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

US Global Investors has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of -18.17%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $94.08, signalling upside risk potential of 2.73%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than US Global Investors.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.415, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.472%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.1M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$382K. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.38x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 79.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.87x versus 3.58x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazard has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 9.18%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat Lazard's return on equity of 44.87%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $94.08, signalling upside risk potential of 2.73%. On the other hand Lazard has an analysts' consensus of $43.33 which suggests that it could grow by 0.45%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Lazard.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.976%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. Lazard offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Lazard quarterly revenues of $657.5M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than Lazard's net income of $60.4M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.38x while Lazard's PE ratio is 15.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.87x versus 1.51x for Lazard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 1.3%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $94.08, signalling upside risk potential of 2.73%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $82.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.21099999999999%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.38x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 16.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.87x versus 1.12x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 27.48%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $94.08, signalling upside risk potential of 2.73%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $84.83 which suggests that it could grow by 2.22%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than SEI Investments.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.863%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.38x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 18.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 2.87x versus 5.02x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.