TROW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

US Global Investors has a net margin of 33.77% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 14.6%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.72% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 3.67%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $115.79, signalling downside risk potential of -1.1%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than US Global Investors.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.836, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.562%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.24%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 62.71% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $603M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of $315K. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.81x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 19.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 3.79x versus 3.40x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hennessy Advisors has a net margin of 33.77% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 26.52%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.72% beat Hennessy Advisors's return on equity of 7.95%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $115.79, signalling downside risk potential of -1.1%. On the other hand Hennessy Advisors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 97.92%. Given that Hennessy Advisors has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Hennessy Advisors is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hennessy Advisors has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.265%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.24%. Hennessy Advisors offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 62.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Hennessy Advisors pays out 58.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Hennessy Advisors quarterly revenues of $8.8M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $603M is higher than Hennessy Advisors's net income of $2.3M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.81x while Hennessy Advisors's PE ratio is 13.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 3.79x versus 3.13x for Hennessy Advisors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 33.77% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of -7.31%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.72% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of -1.82%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $115.79, signalling downside risk potential of -1.1%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.231%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.24%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 62.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 100.37% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Principal Financial Group's is not.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $603M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of -$220M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.81x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 3.79x versus 1.31x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 33.77% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 28.82%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.72% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $115.79, signalling downside risk potential of -1.1%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $80.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.33%. Given that SEI Investments has more downside risk than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than SEI Investments.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.24%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 62.71% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $603M is higher than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.81x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 3.79x versus 5.43x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.