AMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Carlyle Group has a net margin of 14.58% compared to Affiliated Managers Group's net margin of 19.51%. Affiliated Managers Group's return on equity of 9.3% beat The Carlyle Group's return on equity of 17.76%.

Affiliated Managers Group has a consensus price target of $200.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.02%. On the other hand The Carlyle Group has an analysts' consensus of $49.17 which suggests that it could grow by 4.15%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group has higher upside potential than The Carlyle Group, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group is more attractive than The Carlyle Group.

Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.102%.

Affiliated Managers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. The Carlyle Group offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Affiliated Managers Group pays 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Affiliated Managers Group quarterly revenues are $496.6M, which are smaller than The Carlyle Group quarterly revenues of $666.5M. Affiliated Managers Group's net income of $72.4M is lower than The Carlyle Group's net income of $130M. Notably, Affiliated Managers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.02x while The Carlyle Group's PE ratio is 16.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affiliated Managers Group is 3.21x versus 5.00x for The Carlyle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 14.58% compared to Affiliated Managers Group's net margin of 24.7%. Affiliated Managers Group's return on equity of 9.3% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 24.93%.

Affiliated Managers Group has a consensus price target of $200.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.02%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Affiliated Managers Group has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.966%.

Affiliated Managers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Affiliated Managers Group pays 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Affiliated Managers Group quarterly revenues are $496.6M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $42M. Affiliated Managers Group's net income of $72.4M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Affiliated Managers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.02x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 9.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affiliated Managers Group is 3.21x versus 2.48x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 14.58% compared to Affiliated Managers Group's net margin of 23.88%. Affiliated Managers Group's return on equity of 9.3% beat Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83%.

Affiliated Managers Group has a consensus price target of $200.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.02%. On the other hand Federated Hermes has an analysts' consensus of $42.29 which suggests that it could fall by -1.57%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.019%.

Affiliated Managers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Federated Hermes offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Affiliated Managers Group pays 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Affiliated Managers Group quarterly revenues are $496.6M, which are larger than Federated Hermes quarterly revenues of $423.5M. Affiliated Managers Group's net income of $72.4M is lower than Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M. Notably, Affiliated Managers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.02x while Federated Hermes's PE ratio is 12.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affiliated Managers Group is 3.21x versus 2.04x for Federated Hermes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.58% compared to Affiliated Managers Group's net margin of 90.2%. Affiliated Managers Group's return on equity of 9.3% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Affiliated Managers Group has a consensus price target of $200.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.02%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could grow by 3.86%. Given that Affiliated Managers Group has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Affiliated Managers Group is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.353%.

Affiliated Managers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Affiliated Managers Group pays 0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Affiliated Managers Group quarterly revenues are $496.6M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Affiliated Managers Group's net income of $72.4M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Affiliated Managers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.02x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 104.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affiliated Managers Group is 3.21x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.