APH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CommScope Holding has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 70.49%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat CommScope Holding's return on equity of --.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $93.67, signalling downside risk potential of -5.16%. On the other hand CommScope Holding has an analysts' consensus of $5.10 which suggests that it could fall by -32.27%. Given that CommScope Holding has more downside risk than Amphenol, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.561%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. CommScope Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. CommScope Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than CommScope Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is lower than CommScope Holding's net income of $784M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.94x while CommScope Holding's PE ratio is 2.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 7.45x versus 0.36x for CommScope Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enphase Energy has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 8.35%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $93.67, signalling downside risk potential of -5.16%. On the other hand Enphase Energy has an analysts' consensus of $51.13 which suggests that it could grow by 22.17%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.965%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Enphase Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Enphase Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Enphase Energy quarterly revenues of $356.1M. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.94x while Enphase Energy's PE ratio is 38.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 7.45x versus 4.14x for Enphase Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -768.06%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -98.68%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $93.67, signalling downside risk potential of -5.16%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 383.09%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.491, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.106%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.94x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 7.45x versus 14.96x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 42.61%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $93.67, signalling downside risk potential of -5.16%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $175.31 which suggests that it could grow by 6.3%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.94x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 53.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 7.45x versus 27.47x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.