APH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Knowles has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -1.51%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat Knowles's return on equity of -29.72%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $86.08, signalling upside risk potential of 6.82%. On the other hand Knowles has an analysts' consensus of $20.75 which suggests that it could grow by 26.76%. Given that Knowles has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Knowles is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Knowles has a beta of 1.400, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.979%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Knowles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Knowles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Knowles quarterly revenues of $132.2M. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than Knowles's net income of -$2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.12x while Knowles's PE ratio is 17.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 6.08x versus 2.35x for Knowles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -62.9%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $86.08, signalling upside risk potential of 6.82%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could grow by 210.95%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.668, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.84%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.12x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 6.08x versus 23.23x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Novanta has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 9.09%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat Novanta's return on equity of 9.7%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $86.08, signalling upside risk potential of 6.82%. On the other hand Novanta has an analysts' consensus of $154.32 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Novanta has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Novanta is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novanta has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.734%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Novanta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Novanta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Novanta quarterly revenues of $233.4M. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than Novanta's net income of $21.2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.12x while Novanta's PE ratio is 62.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 6.08x versus 4.63x for Novanta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optical Cable has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -7.04%. Amphenol's return on equity of 27.47% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.34%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $86.08, signalling upside risk potential of 6.82%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amphenol has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than Optical Cable.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.55%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.75%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Amphenol's net income of $737.8M is higher than Optical Cable's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.12x while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 6.08x versus 0.37x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.