KULR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Isomet has a net margin of -62.9% compared to KULR Technology Group's net margin of --. KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31% beat Isomet's return on equity of --.

KULR Technology Group has a consensus price target of $4.22, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Isomet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Isomet, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Isomet.

KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.739, which suggesting that the stock is 73.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Isomet has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.97%.

KULR Technology Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Isomet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KULR Technology Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Isomet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are larger than Isomet quarterly revenues of --. KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M is higher than Isomet's net income of --. Notably, KULR Technology Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Isomet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KULR Technology Group is 56.78x versus -- for Isomet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Novanta has a net margin of -62.9% compared to KULR Technology Group's net margin of 7.85%. KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31% beat Novanta's return on equity of 8.73%.

KULR Technology Group has a consensus price target of $4.22, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Novanta has an analysts' consensus of $175.10 which suggests that it could grow by 5.93%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Novanta, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Novanta.

KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.739, which suggesting that the stock is 73.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novanta has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.025%.

KULR Technology Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Novanta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KULR Technology Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Novanta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than Novanta quarterly revenues of $244.4M. KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M is lower than Novanta's net income of $19.2M. Notably, KULR Technology Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Novanta's PE ratio is 93.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KULR Technology Group is 56.78x versus 6.09x for Novanta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -62.9% compared to KULR Technology Group's net margin of 55.04%. KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

KULR Technology Group has a consensus price target of $4.22, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than NVIDIA.

KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.739, which suggesting that the stock is 73.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

KULR Technology Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. KULR Technology Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, KULR Technology Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KULR Technology Group is 56.78x versus 30.78x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optical Cable has a net margin of -62.9% compared to KULR Technology Group's net margin of 1.92%. KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.95%.

KULR Technology Group has a consensus price target of $4.22, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Optical Cable.

KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.739, which suggesting that the stock is 73.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.438, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.203%.

KULR Technology Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KULR Technology Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $19.5M. KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M is lower than Optical Cable's net income of $373.5K. Notably, KULR Technology Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KULR Technology Group is 56.78x versus 0.36x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.