AVGO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 30.77% compared to Broadcom's net margin of -125.26%. Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

Broadcom has a consensus price target of $238.60, signalling upside risk potential of 6.37%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.21 which suggests that it could grow by 26.43%. Given that Intel has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Intel is more attractive than Broadcom.

Broadcom has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.259% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.671%.

Broadcom has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Intel offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Broadcom pays 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Broadcom quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Broadcom's net income of $4.3B is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, Broadcom's price-to-earnings ratio is 182.96x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadcom is 20.61x versus 1.51x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 30.77% compared to Broadcom's net margin of -44.61%. Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -10.25%.

Broadcom has a consensus price target of $238.60, signalling upside risk potential of 6.37%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $122.02 which suggests that it could grow by 6.74%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Broadcom.

Broadcom has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.259% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.413, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.297%.

Broadcom has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Broadcom pays 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -22.16% of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadcom quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Broadcom's net income of $4.3B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of -$676.3M. Notably, Broadcom's price-to-earnings ratio is 182.96x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadcom is 20.61x versus 18.40x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 30.77% compared to Broadcom's net margin of 21.47%. Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

Broadcom has a consensus price target of $238.60, signalling upside risk potential of 6.37%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $131.16 which suggests that it could grow by 32.04%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Broadcom.

Broadcom has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.259% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.57%.

Broadcom has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Broadcom pays 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Broadcom quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Broadcom's net income of $4.3B is higher than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Broadcom's price-to-earnings ratio is 182.96x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 28.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadcom is 20.61x versus 3.86x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 30.77% compared to Broadcom's net margin of 55.04%. Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Broadcom has a consensus price target of $238.60, signalling upside risk potential of 6.37%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 27.14%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Broadcom.

Broadcom has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.259% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.285%.

Broadcom has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Broadcom pays 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Broadcom quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Broadcom's net income of $4.3B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Broadcom's price-to-earnings ratio is 182.96x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 53.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadcom is 20.61x versus 29.83x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.