NVDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 55.04% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 11.31%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.25%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $172.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.72%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $183.16 which suggests that it could grow by 47%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than NVIDIA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, which suggesting that the stock is 63.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.343%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $35.1B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $6.8B. NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $771M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.97x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 112.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 30.66x versus 8.38x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 55.04% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of -125.26%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $172.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.72%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.44%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Intel.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, which suggesting that the stock is 63.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Intel offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Intel's is not.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $35.1B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.97x while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 30.66x versus 1.59x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of 55.04% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 23.29%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43% beat Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 20.38%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $172.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.72%. On the other hand Monolithic Power Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.18%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than NVIDIA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, which suggesting that the stock is 63.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.934%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Monolithic Power Systems offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 43.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $35.1B, which are larger than Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues of $620.1M. NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B is higher than Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $144.4M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.97x while Monolithic Power Systems's PE ratio is 69.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 30.66x versus 14.81x for Monolithic Power Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 55.04% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of -44.61%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -10.25%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $172.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.72%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $120.80 which suggests that it could grow by 6.19%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Marvell Technology, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Marvell Technology.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, which suggesting that the stock is 63.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.457, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.674%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.02%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -22.16% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $35.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.5B. NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of -$676.3M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.97x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 30.66x versus 18.31x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.