NVDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 9.53%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $167.49, signalling upside risk potential of 20.92%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $127.53 which suggests that it could grow by 13%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, which suggesting that the stock is 111.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.904%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.89x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 82.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 25.62x versus 6.64x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of -6.48%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $167.49, signalling upside risk potential of 20.92%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.39 which suggests that it could grow by 5.01%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Intel.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, which suggesting that the stock is 111.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.441%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. Intel offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.89x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 25.62x versus 1.65x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 35.53%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $167.49, signalling upside risk potential of 20.92%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $785.89 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, which suggesting that the stock is 111.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.453%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. KLA offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.89x while KLA's PE ratio is 28.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 25.62x versus 9.05x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 4.18%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 7.33%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $167.49, signalling upside risk potential of 20.92%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $62.78 which suggests that it could grow by 35.55%. Given that Lattice Semiconductor has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Lattice Semiconductor is more attractive than NVIDIA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, which suggesting that the stock is 111.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.601, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.065%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $120.2M. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $5M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.89x while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 125.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 25.62x versus 13.10x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.