ENPH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Solar has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of 24.81%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94% beat First Solar's return on equity of 16.68%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $57.39, signalling upside risk potential of 38.65%. On the other hand First Solar has an analysts' consensus of $201.78 which suggests that it could grow by 27.65%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than First Solar, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than First Solar.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.805, which suggesting that the stock is 80.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Solar has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.463%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $356.1M, which are smaller than First Solar quarterly revenues of $844.6M. Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M is lower than First Solar's net income of $209.5M. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.32x while First Solar's PE ratio is 13.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 4.10x versus 3.99x for First Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FTC Solar has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of -18.36%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94% beat FTC Solar's return on equity of -132.79%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $57.39, signalling upside risk potential of 38.65%. On the other hand FTC Solar has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.23%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than FTC Solar.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.805, which suggesting that the stock is 80.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FTC Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FTC Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $356.1M, which are larger than FTC Solar quarterly revenues of $20.8M. Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M is higher than FTC Solar's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.32x while FTC Solar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 4.10x versus 0.98x for FTC Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of 42.61%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $57.39, signalling upside risk potential of 38.65%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $169.75 which suggests that it could grow by 25.62%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.805, which suggesting that the stock is 80.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.31%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $356.1M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.32x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 43.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 4.10x versus 22.51x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoals Technologies Group has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of -0.35%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94% beat Shoals Technologies Group's return on equity of 3.46%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $57.39, signalling upside risk potential of 38.65%. On the other hand Shoals Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.31 which suggests that it could grow by 33.69%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than Shoals Technologies Group, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than Shoals Technologies Group.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.805, which suggesting that the stock is 80.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoals Technologies Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoals Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoals Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $356.1M, which are larger than Shoals Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $80.4M. Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M is higher than Shoals Technologies Group's net income of -$282K. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.32x while Shoals Technologies Group's PE ratio is 39.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 4.10x versus 2.04x for Shoals Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.