ENPH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Solar has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of 24.81%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94% beat First Solar's return on equity of 16.68%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $55.26, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand First Solar has an analysts' consensus of $203.52 which suggests that it could grow by 16.16%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than First Solar, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than First Solar.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Solar has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.908%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $356.1M, which are smaller than First Solar quarterly revenues of $844.6M. Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M is lower than First Solar's net income of $209.5M. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while First Solar's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 4.51x versus 4.43x for First Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FTC Solar has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of -18.36%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94% beat FTC Solar's return on equity of -132.79%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $55.26, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand FTC Solar has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could fall by -5.57%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than FTC Solar.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTC Solar has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FTC Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FTC Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $356.1M, which are larger than FTC Solar quarterly revenues of $20.8M. Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M is higher than FTC Solar's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while FTC Solar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 4.51x versus 1.09x for FTC Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of 42.61%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $55.26, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.11 which suggests that it could grow by 21.23%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Enphase Energy, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Enphase Energy.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.079%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $356.1M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 45.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 4.51x versus 23.64x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoals Technologies Group has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of -0.35%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 16.94% beat Shoals Technologies Group's return on equity of 3.46%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $55.26, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Shoals Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.31 which suggests that it could grow by 23.48%. Given that Shoals Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Enphase Energy, analysts believe Shoals Technologies Group is more attractive than Enphase Energy.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.694, which suggesting that the stock is 69.352% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoals Technologies Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoals Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoals Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $356.1M, which are larger than Shoals Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $80.4M. Enphase Energy's net income of $29.7M is higher than Shoals Technologies Group's net income of -$282K. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Shoals Technologies Group's PE ratio is 43.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 4.51x versus 2.21x for Shoals Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.