FUJHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mitsubishi Motors has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of -0.69%. Subaru's return on equity of 12.74% beat Mitsubishi Motors's return on equity of 3.95%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi Motors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Motors, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Mitsubishi Motors.

Subaru has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi Motors has a beta of 0.243, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.695%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Mitsubishi Motors offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Subaru pays 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Motors pays out 45.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Mitsubishi Motors quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than Mitsubishi Motors's net income of -$31M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.03x while Mitsubishi Motors's PE ratio is 17.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.43x versus 0.26x for Mitsubishi Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mazda Motor has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of 4.26%. Subaru's return on equity of 12.74% beat Mazda Motor's return on equity of 6.31%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mazda Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Mazda Motor, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Mazda Motor.

Subaru has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mazda Motor has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.507%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Mazda Motor offers a yield of 6.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Subaru pays 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Mazda Motor pays out 33.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are smaller than Mazda Motor quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than Mazda Motor's net income of $362.2M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.03x while Mazda Motor's PE ratio is 5.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.43x versus 0.12x for Mazda Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nissan Motor has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of -0.45%. Subaru's return on equity of 12.74% beat Nissan Motor's return on equity of -10.71%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nissan Motor has an analysts' consensus of $4.95 which suggests that it could fall by -1.54%. Given that Nissan Motor has higher upside potential than Subaru, analysts believe Nissan Motor is more attractive than Subaru.

Subaru has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nissan Motor has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.762%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Nissan Motor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Subaru pays 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Nissan Motor pays out -8.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Subaru's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are smaller than Nissan Motor quarterly revenues of $20.7B. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than Nissan Motor's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.03x while Nissan Motor's PE ratio is 4.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.43x versus 0.11x for Nissan Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of 5.38%. Subaru's return on equity of 12.74% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 13.1%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of $225.82 which suggests that it could grow by 18.5%. Given that Toyota Motor has higher upside potential than Subaru, analysts believe Toyota Motor is more attractive than Subaru.

Subaru has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.904% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.242%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.46 per share. Subaru pays 23.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 23.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Subaru's net income of $1B is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $4.4B. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.03x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 8.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.43x versus 0.80x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.