DNZOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Denso's net margin of --. Denso's return on equity of 7.82% beat Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09%.

Denso has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Denso has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe Denso is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Denso has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.756% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Denso has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Linkage Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Denso pays 43.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Denso's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Denso quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than Linkage Global quarterly revenues of --. Denso's net income of $799.3M is higher than Linkage Global's net income of --. Notably, Denso's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.42x while Linkage Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Denso is 0.84x versus 0.49x for Linkage Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Denso's net margin of --. Denso's return on equity of 7.82% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's return on equity of --.

Denso has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 226.85%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has higher upside potential than Denso, analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies is more attractive than Denso.

Denso has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.756% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Denso has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Denso pays 43.07% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Denso's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Denso quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Denso's net income of $799.3M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Denso's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.42x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's PE ratio is 7.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Denso is 0.84x versus 0.17x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Denso's net margin of --. Denso's return on equity of 7.82% beat Tokyo Lifestyle's return on equity of 19.93%.

Denso has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Denso has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle, analysts believe Denso is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle.

Denso has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.756% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Denso has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Tokyo Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Denso pays 43.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Denso's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Denso quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle quarterly revenues of --. Denso's net income of $799.3M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle's net income of --. Notably, Denso's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.42x while Tokyo Lifestyle's PE ratio is 1.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Denso is 0.84x versus 0.07x for Tokyo Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Denso's net margin of 5.38%. Denso's return on equity of 7.82% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 13.1%.

Denso has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of $225.82 which suggests that it could grow by 27.1%. Given that Toyota Motor has higher upside potential than Denso, analysts believe Toyota Motor is more attractive than Denso.

Denso has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.756% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.685%.

Denso has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.46 per share. Denso pays 43.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 23.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Denso quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Denso's net income of $799.3M is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $4.4B. Notably, Denso's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.42x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 7.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Denso is 0.84x versus 0.75x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.