LGCB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Linkage Global's net margin of --. Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's return on equity of --.

Linkage Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 253.51%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Linkage Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Linkage Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Linkage Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Linkage Global's net income of -- is lower than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Linkage Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's PE ratio is 6.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Linkage Global is 0.47x versus 0.15x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NSK has a net margin of -- compared to Linkage Global's net margin of 0.99%. Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09% beat NSK's return on equity of 1.55%.

Linkage Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NSK has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Linkage Global has higher upside potential than NSK, analysts believe Linkage Global is more attractive than NSK.

Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NSK has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.959%.

Linkage Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NSK offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Linkage Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NSK pays out 146.95% of its earnings as a dividend.

Linkage Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NSK quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Linkage Global's net income of -- is lower than NSK's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Linkage Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NSK's PE ratio is 31.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Linkage Global is 0.47x versus 0.42x for NSK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle has a net margin of -- compared to Linkage Global's net margin of --. Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09% beat Tokyo Lifestyle's return on equity of 19.93%.

Linkage Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Linkage Global has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle, analysts believe Linkage Global is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle.

Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Linkage Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tokyo Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Linkage Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Linkage Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tokyo Lifestyle quarterly revenues of --. Linkage Global's net income of -- is lower than Tokyo Lifestyle's net income of --. Notably, Linkage Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tokyo Lifestyle's PE ratio is 1.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Linkage Global is 0.47x versus 0.07x for Tokyo Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of -- compared to Linkage Global's net margin of 5.38%. Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 13.1%.

Linkage Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of $225.82 which suggests that it could grow by 20.97%. Given that Toyota Motor has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe Toyota Motor is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.206%.

Linkage Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share. Linkage Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 23.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Linkage Global quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Linkage Global's net income of -- is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $4.4B. Notably, Linkage Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 7.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Linkage Global is 0.47x versus 0.78x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.