WGO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of -0.07% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of 6.32%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $48.92, signalling upside risk potential of 42.82%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $53.82 which suggests that it could grow by 8.49%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.127%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.88%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $620.2M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.36x versus 0.29x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -0.07% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of -43.95%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $48.92, signalling upside risk potential of 42.82%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could fall by -1.86%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.88%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $620.2M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.36x versus 3.15x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Industries has a net margin of -0.07% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of -0.03%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45% beat Thor Industries's return on equity of 5.04%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $48.92, signalling upside risk potential of 42.82%. On the other hand Thor Industries has an analysts' consensus of $86.83 which suggests that it could grow by 5.77%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Thor Industries.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.819%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.88%. Thor Industries offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries pays out 38.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $620.2M, which are smaller than Thor Industries quarterly revenues of $2B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K is higher than Thor Industries's net income of -$551K. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Thor Industries's PE ratio is 21.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.36x versus 0.46x for Thor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -0.07% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of 2.12%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $48.92, signalling upside risk potential of 42.82%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -16.48%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Tesla.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.955% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.88%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $620.2M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Tesla's PE ratio is 196.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.36x versus 13.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.