WGO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of -0.07% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of 6.32%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $44.58, signalling upside risk potential of 35.39%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.31%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.391% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.003%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $620.2M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.35x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -0.07% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of -155.79%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $44.58, signalling upside risk potential of 35.39%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 20.37%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.391% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $620.2M, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.35x versus 6.34x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Industries has a net margin of -0.07% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of 4.67%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45% beat Thor Industries's return on equity of 5.48%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $44.58, signalling upside risk potential of 35.39%. On the other hand Thor Industries has an analysts' consensus of $88.17 which suggests that it could grow by 0.2%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Thor Industries.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.391% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.094%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Thor Industries offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries pays out 38.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $620.2M, which are smaller than Thor Industries quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K is lower than Thor Industries's net income of $135.2M. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Thor Industries's PE ratio is 21.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.35x versus 0.49x for Thor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -0.07% compared to Winnebago Industries's net margin of 2.12%. Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Winnebago Industries has a consensus price target of $44.58, signalling upside risk potential of 35.39%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.56 which suggests that it could fall by -5.5%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Tesla.

Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.391% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

Winnebago Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winnebago Industries pays 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues are $620.2M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Winnebago Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 196.43x while Tesla's PE ratio is 175.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winnebago Industries is 0.35x versus 11.69x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.