IPAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 12.54% compared to Interparfums's net margin of 4.48%. Interparfums's return on equity of 17.47% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -17.08%.

Interparfums has a consensus price target of $165.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.62%. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $69.08 which suggests that it could fall by -1.3%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than The Estee Lauder Companies, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than The Estee Lauder Companies.

Interparfums has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.308%.

Interparfums has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Interparfums pays 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

Interparfums quarterly revenues are $338.8M, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Interparfums's net income of $42.5M is lower than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of $159M. Notably, Interparfums's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.53x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interparfums is 3.10x versus 1.71x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Edgewell Personal Care has a net margin of 12.54% compared to Interparfums's net margin of 4.99%. Interparfums's return on equity of 17.47% beat Edgewell Personal Care's return on equity of 5.48%.

Interparfums has a consensus price target of $165.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.62%. On the other hand Edgewell Personal Care has an analysts' consensus of $32.38 which suggests that it could grow by 30.33%. Given that Edgewell Personal Care has higher upside potential than Interparfums, analysts believe Edgewell Personal Care is more attractive than Interparfums.

Interparfums has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edgewell Personal Care has a beta of 0.838, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.198%.

Interparfums has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Edgewell Personal Care offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Interparfums pays 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Edgewell Personal Care pays out 31.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interparfums quarterly revenues are $338.8M, which are smaller than Edgewell Personal Care quarterly revenues of $580.7M. Interparfums's net income of $42.5M is higher than Edgewell Personal Care's net income of $29M. Notably, Interparfums's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.53x while Edgewell Personal Care's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interparfums is 3.10x versus 0.55x for Edgewell Personal Care. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 12.54% compared to Interparfums's net margin of 19.06%. Interparfums's return on equity of 17.47% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Interparfums has a consensus price target of $165.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.62%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $172.88 which suggests that it could grow by 5.94%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Interparfums has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.430, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.957%.

Interparfums has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Interparfums pays 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interparfums quarterly revenues are $338.8M, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Interparfums's net income of $42.5M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Interparfums's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.53x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 25.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interparfums is 3.10x versus 4.79x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United-Guardian has a net margin of 12.54% compared to Interparfums's net margin of 22.61%. Interparfums's return on equity of 17.47% beat United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15%.

Interparfums has a consensus price target of $165.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.62%. On the other hand United-Guardian has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than United-Guardian.

Interparfums has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United-Guardian has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.751%.

Interparfums has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. United-Guardian offers a yield of 8.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Interparfums pays 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. United-Guardian pays out 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interparfums quarterly revenues are $338.8M, which are larger than United-Guardian quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Interparfums's net income of $42.5M is higher than United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K. Notably, Interparfums's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.53x while United-Guardian's PE ratio is 13.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interparfums is 3.10x versus 3.30x for United-Guardian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.