RACE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 22.99% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of 6.32%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.74% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $514.61, signalling upside risk potential of 11.61%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.61%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Ferrari NV, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Ferrari NV.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.003%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $3.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Ferrari NV's net income of $433.1M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.71x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 11.21x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 22.99% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of -43.95%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.74% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $514.61, signalling upside risk potential of 11.61%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.87 which suggests that it could grow by 8.93%. Given that Ferrari NV has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Ferrari NV is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $3.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrari NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ferrari NV's net income of $433.1M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.71x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 11.21x versus 2.87x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 22.99% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of 2.12%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.74% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $514.61, signalling upside risk potential of 11.61%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.97 which suggests that it could fall by -6.46%. Given that Ferrari NV has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Ferrari NV is more attractive than Tesla.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $3.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrari NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Ferrari NV's net income of $433.1M is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.71x while Tesla's PE ratio is 177.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 11.21x versus 11.80x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of 22.99% compared to Ferrari NV's net margin of -3221.01%. Ferrari NV's return on equity of 46.74% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -187.31%.

Ferrari NV has a consensus price target of $514.61, signalling upside risk potential of 11.61%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 101.72%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Ferrari NV, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Ferrari NV.

Ferrari NV has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.770, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.952%.

Ferrari NV has a quarterly dividend of $3.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferrari NV pays 28.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrari NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrari NV quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $640.9K. Ferrari NV's net income of $433.1M is higher than Workhorse Group's net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Ferrari NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.71x while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrari NV is 11.21x versus 0.49x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.