WKHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envirotech Vehicles has a net margin of -3221.01% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -2376.76%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -187.31% beat Envirotech Vehicles's return on equity of -107.08%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Envirotech Vehicles has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8135.29%. Given that Envirotech Vehicles has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Envirotech Vehicles is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.770, which suggesting that the stock is 176.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envirotech Vehicles has a beta of 2.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.626%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envirotech Vehicles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envirotech Vehicles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $640.9K, which are larger than Envirotech Vehicles quarterly revenues of $590.6K. Workhorse Group's net income of -$20.6M is lower than Envirotech Vehicles's net income of -$14M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envirotech Vehicles's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.57x versus 2.09x for Envirotech Vehicles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -3221.01% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -3252.53%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -187.31% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -208.67%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6530512.9%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.770, which suggesting that the stock is 176.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $640.9K, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of $316K. Workhorse Group's net income of -$20.6M is lower than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.57x versus 71.45x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -3221.01% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -155.79%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -187.31% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 19.23%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.770, which suggesting that the stock is 176.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $640.9K, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Workhorse Group's net income of -$20.6M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.57x versus 6.40x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volcon has a net margin of -3221.01% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -334.28%. Workhorse Group's return on equity of -187.31% beat Volcon's return on equity of -326.98%.

Workhorse Group has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 75.44%. On the other hand Volcon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 63065656.5%. Given that Volcon has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Volcon is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.770, which suggesting that the stock is 176.952% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volcon has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workhorse Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Volcon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workhorse Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volcon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workhorse Group quarterly revenues are $640.9K, which are smaller than Volcon quarterly revenues of $736.1K. Workhorse Group's net income of -$20.6M is lower than Volcon's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Workhorse Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Volcon's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workhorse Group is 0.57x versus 0.24x for Volcon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.