PRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of -2.17% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of -3.51%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 3.58% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling downside risk potential of -1.06%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $152.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.63%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than ProAssurance.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.386%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $268.1M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. ProAssurance's net income of -$5.8M is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.94x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 15.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 1.06x versus 2.11x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of -2.17% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 7.67%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 3.58% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling downside risk potential of -1.06%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could fall by -6.97%. Given that CNA Financial has more downside risk than ProAssurance, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than CNA Financial.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.159%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $268.1M, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. ProAssurance's net income of -$5.8M is lower than CNA Financial's net income of $274M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.94x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 14.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 1.06x versus 0.93x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCI Group has a net margin of -2.17% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 1.6%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 3.58% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling downside risk potential of -1.06%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $167.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.18%. Given that HCI Group has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe HCI Group is more attractive than ProAssurance.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.235, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.542%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $268.1M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $161.4M. ProAssurance's net income of -$5.8M is lower than HCI Group's net income of $2.6M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.94x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 17.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 1.06x versus 2.51x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of -2.17% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 2.86%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 3.58% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling downside risk potential of -1.06%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.31%. Given that Safety Insurance Group has more downside risk than ProAssurance, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.16%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $268.1M, which are smaller than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $284.7M. ProAssurance's net income of -$5.8M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.94x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 1.06x versus 1.04x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.