ALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Hartford Insurance Group has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Allstate's net margin of 9.3%. Allstate's return on equity of 19.96% beat The Hartford Insurance Group's return on equity of 18.34%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $229.18, signalling upside risk potential of 19.1%. On the other hand The Hartford Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $136.54 which suggests that it could grow by 14.04%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Hartford Insurance Group, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Hartford Insurance Group.

Allstate has a beta of 0.333, which suggesting that the stock is 66.698% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Insurance Group has a beta of 0.693, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.725%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. The Hartford Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Allstate pays 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Insurance Group pays out 18.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than The Hartford Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Allstate's net income of $595M is lower than The Hartford Insurance Group's net income of $630M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while The Hartford Insurance Group's PE ratio is 11.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.79x versus 1.32x for The Hartford Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Allstate's net margin of -7.77%. Allstate's return on equity of 19.96% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $229.18, signalling upside risk potential of 19.1%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.52%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Allstate.

Allstate has a beta of 0.333, which suggesting that the stock is 66.698% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.964%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Mercury General offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Allstate pays 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Allstate's net income of $595M is higher than Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 12.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.79x versus 0.66x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Allstate's net margin of 12.58%. Allstate's return on equity of 19.96% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $229.18, signalling upside risk potential of 19.1%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $286.7956 which suggests that it could grow by 18.41%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Progressive.

Allstate has a beta of 0.333, which suggesting that the stock is 66.698% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.092%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Progressive offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Allstate pays 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Allstate's net income of $595M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Progressive's PE ratio is 16.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.79x versus 1.81x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Allstate's net margin of 3.35%. Allstate's return on equity of 19.96% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $229.18, signalling upside risk potential of 19.1%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $281.27 which suggests that it could grow by 10.1%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Allstate has a beta of 0.333, which suggesting that the stock is 66.698% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.316%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Allstate pays 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Allstate's net income of $595M is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 13.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.79x versus 1.25x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.