CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 7.31%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $155.67, signalling upside risk potential of 5.6%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.72%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.757, which suggesting that the stock is 24.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.478%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.08x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 14.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.12x versus 0.93x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 8.55%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $155.67, signalling upside risk potential of 5.6%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.76%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.757, which suggesting that the stock is 24.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.821%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.08x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.12x versus 1.06x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 3.35%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $155.67, signalling upside risk potential of 5.6%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $280.32 which suggests that it could grow by 10.16%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.757, which suggesting that the stock is 24.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.316%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.08x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 13.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.12x versus 1.25x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 11.84%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $155.67, signalling upside risk potential of 5.6%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $70.96 which suggests that it could grow by 3.03%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.757, which suggesting that the stock is 24.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.415, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.545%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.08x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 15.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.12x versus 1.98x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.