CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of -3.51%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.4%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $152.83 which suggests that it could grow by 4.42%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.376%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.91x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 15.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.88x versus 2.10x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.34%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Loews's return on equity of 7.5%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.4%. On the other hand Loews has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -63.91%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.242%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Loews offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews pays out 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Loews quarterly revenues of $4.4B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is lower than Loews's net income of $370M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.91x while Loews's PE ratio is 14.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.88x versus 1.10x for Loews. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 12.58%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.4%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $288.3129 which suggests that it could grow by 7.64%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.146%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Progressive offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.91x while Progressive's PE ratio is 18.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.88x versus 2.00x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProAssurance has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of -2.17%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat ProAssurance's return on equity of 3.58%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -1.4%. On the other hand ProAssurance has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could fall by -1.11%. Given that CNA Financial has more downside risk than ProAssurance, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProAssurance has a beta of 0.135, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.461%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. ProAssurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. ProAssurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than ProAssurance quarterly revenues of $268.1M. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is higher than ProAssurance's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.91x while ProAssurance's PE ratio is 27.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.88x versus 1.06x for ProAssurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.